A matured, unbiased and educated individual will accept the facts even though their heart inhibits. As a rule, human minds find hard to accept whatever against their view. We have the right to criticize even the God, so why not the leader. We are living in a world with freedom of speech. Fortunately, I do not need to have any qualification to criticize anyone. Many Tamils would feel that what qualification do I have to criticize the leader. The above all features do not exempt from criticism. He had the good intention for the Tamils. He developed very good war tactics and equipment. He had the capacity to develop a conventional armed force and defacto government. Mr Prabhakaran was a well-disciplined and altruistic individual. I am trying to say some politicians and some racist Sinhalese must take the responsibility for the bloody war. I am not portraying, as all Singhalese are cruel. Sri Lankan government has committed more mistakes than LTTE. Also, This article does not disregard what Sri Lankan governments and forces have done to Tamils. This article does not criticize his purpose. An unbiased reader should accept above points before continue read. It is justifiable to a degree because Tamils grabbed violence method after all other measures failed. The circumstances and political environment forced Tamils to choose the violence. Also, in many ways, Tamils were discriminated and abused racially. But we all know how the Sinhalese majority handled them.
The succeeders such as Mr G.G Ponnambalam and Mr Celvanayakam et al staged peaceful protest to reclaim Tamil’s rights. Tamil political leaders, such as Sir Pon Ramanathan and Sir Pon Arunachalam, failed to secure the rights of minority Tamils.
First of all, we all need to acknowledge that there is an ethnic problem between minority Tamils and majority Singhalese for decades.
0 kommentar(er)
